Sign the Petition to Tom Vilsack, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture

OCA-circle-logo-b90From Organic Consumers Association


Link to sign the petition

Well placed people in the government, neverending pockets of money, the ability to maneuver the news media and keep information from consumers about what is in their food. People have a RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT IS IN THEIR FOOD, and yet, the food sources that agri-business wants us to consumer are causing the cancers, diabetes, obesity. Our sick children tell us that something is wrong with the food supply. These things don’t just happen and being educated about food is one of the most important things we can do to save our lives and the planet. Sign this petition, share it, do what you can to buy non-GMO food (purchase organic when you can), let your representatives know how you feel (big business banks on people just complying and saying nothing). The change is in your hands and wallets. Read the petition below, click on the link above.


We write in response to your request for information on the topic of “enhancing agricultural coexistence.”

This inquiry is a shameless charade designed to mask the truth that as long as genetically engineered crops remain untested, unregulated and unlabeled, we face “the potential elimination of a farmer’s choice to grow non-genetically engineered crops, or a consumer’s choice to eat non-genetically engineered food.”

You’ll recognize the quote from a case that bears your name, Center for Food Safety v. Vilsack, where Judge Jeffrey S. White ruled that your approval of genetically engineered sugar beets was illegal.

Even before becoming USDA Secretary, you were familiar with the contamination problem inherent in genetically engineered crops. And you were hostile to any suggestion that the government take meaningful action to prevent it.

In 2002, a corn crop engineered by ProdiGene to produce a vaccine for pigs contaminated 500,000 bushels of soybeans, grown the following season in the same field. This after a previous incident in Iowa, where the USDA ordered ProdiGene to pay for the burning of 155 acres of conventional corn presumed contaminated by ProdiGene plants. ProdiGene eventually went out of business. But not before it received a $6 million investment from the Governors Biotechnology Partnership, which you chaired.

In reaction to suggestions that pharma crops should be kept away from food crops, you countered that “we should not overreact and hamstring this industry.”

One of the best ways for farmers to protect themselves from genetic contamination is to pass local laws that establish zones safeguarding the region’s economic interests. Many farmers, not just organic and non-GMO farmers, have an interest in protecting themselves from unwanted genetic contamination. Farmers that grow GMO crops for food don’t want to be contaminated with GMO crops grown for feed, fuel or pharma. Farmers growing approved GMO varieties don’t want to be contaminated with unapproved varieties. Farmers growing for the export market don’t want to be contaminated with GMOs that aren’t accepted by our trading partners.

Unfortunately, we already know that you oppose local action to prevent genetic contamination. In 2005, as governor you initiated and then signed into law House File 642, which took away local communities’ rights to act on this issue.

It clearly doesn’t bother you if farmers’ right to choose to grow non-genetically engineered crops is taken away.

You also aren’t interested in in protecting consumers’ right to choose to eat non-genetically engineered food. This is demonstrated by the fact that you have approved several new genetically engineered foods. And you have required labels on none.

We disagree with your disingenuous insistence that genetically engineered crops can coexist with the crops that they will contaminate and destroy.

Please take a fresh look at the only two options that can truly protect farmers’ and consumers’ right to choose: local control over genetically engineered crops and labels on genetically engineered foods.

Organic Consumers Association


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s